
- Posted from the depths of my mind.
A dreamer. A contradiction. A lover of beauty, art, music, my dog, laughing, smiling, creativity, holding hands, antiques, photography, warmth, cold, , sleeping, vampires, zombies, pretty dresses, silver, Dali, the ocean, the moon driving fast, long drives on an open road, romance, open fires, camping, sunsets, stars, dancing, and never growing up. It's the little things that make my heart glow.
Author: Me! Date: Saturday, 30 April 2011 3:35:12 PM EST Subject: RE: Virtual Tutorial Topic 5 The differences are the different definitions of 'tradition' used by each Judge. Justice Olney viewed tradition to be unchanging and for native title to apply the laws and customs of the Yorta Yorta must remain the same as those practiced by the Yorta Yorta's ancestors. Olney J found that the traditional laws and customs had evolved and changed over the years and therefore tradition had been lost. Tradition had to be same now as those traditions practiced hundreds of years ago. Chief Justice Black however thought tradition should be looked at not from the past to the present but retrospectively. Black CJ does not think that traditions are lost altogether over the years, more that there are dynamic social aspects of the traditions that are maintained over time. There doesn't have to be a physical tradition per se for the actual tradition to still be upheld - it is the structures and socio-legal orders that maintain the tradition. I don't think it's whether Aboriginal people can prove continuity of tradition in a white court, it's more whether a white court will acknowledge that tradition is not something frozen in time, it's more something that exists and manifests itself within the culture where practices, laws and customs are still used through socio-legal orders , it's not about ritualistic dances being held to 'prove' tradition. Tradition shouldn't be looked at as a continual 'physical' entity but rather something that is followed and applied to the daily customs and practices of law, order and social engagement within the community. The example in Yammer v Eaton of Aboriginal men fishing with a motor boat and not wading through water with a spear does not mean that the tradition nature of the activity is lost. It is still a tradition for them to fish for food. The means by which they go about the activity does mean that the tradition is lost. |
Hi ******** A good response. You have shown that you understand what tradition means and how it ought to be applied. Greta |
To dream that you kill someone, indicates that you are on the verge of losing your temper and self-control. Consider the person you have killed and ask yourself if you feel any rage towards him or her in your waking life. Your dream may be expressing some hidden anger. Alternatively, you may be trying to kill an aspect of yourself that is represented by the person killed. Identify the characteristics of this person and ask yourself which of these qualities you are trying to put an end to.
To dream that you have been killed, suggests that your actions are disconnected from your emotions and conscience. The dream refers to drastic changes that you are trying to make. There is a characteristic that you want to get rid of or a habit that you want to end within yourself. Killing represents the killing off of the old parts and old habits. Alternatively, the dream represents feelings of being let down or betrayed by someone in your waking life. You are feeling overwhelmed, shocked and disappointed.
Hi all, I was asked for some guidance on the distribution of grades for assignment 2. I have finally had a moment to do this. The figures I have from Blackboard take into consideration Assignment 1 and 2 and they unfortunately do not quite fit nicely with our HD, D approach etc so I will leave it to your devises to convert, but for those interested these numbers may guide you a little. The average mark was a C+. Well done people, excellent work. Sixty odd students were marked between 50-69; around 90 students received marks between 70-79; 40 or so students got between 80-89 and there were a smattering of marks both above and below that. regards |
Its great to hear from you. I really enjoy hearing from all our puppy buyers. Of course I know who you are and which one Raider was.....I am glad that he has turned out to be such a lovely boy. I must say that he is quite a nice looking boy too. When I opened the first photo of him running straight into the camera, he did make me glance twice. Very very nice looking boy. You know, thank you for your compliments regarding his temperament. We put a lot of effort into their first 8 weeks of life, to give them as much exposure as they can tolerate being babies, which gives them a great start, but the credit regarding his nature and temperament certainly lies with you dear, because its thanks to your ongoing attention and love that he has turned out to be something to be proud of. Job well done.
Please keep up the pictures because I save all of them when I get them. If you have a look at my website, you will see one of Raiders sisters went to New Zealand “Kanjelese dogs abroad” and she is doint very well in the show ring. If you don’t mind I would like to put Raider on the website.
What a lovely reply. I've never thought his temperament had anything to do with me. I've always thought he was born that way and it came down through his parents. His mum was very placid and friendly (ok he's not placid but she had a great temperament). His photos should be on the website soon. How exciting!